Rudder's comment, when I told him about being asked if I were pregant, was "Well, you can use this to push you to work out harder."
*facepalm*
OK, that's not really fair. His first comment was, "What? You don't look pregnant!" (Only the sad thing was, in that dress and while slumping, I did, a little. Say three or four months.) I did point out that I'm working out less not because I'm a lazy slacker (well, I am) but deliberately, to provide more time for the flight training.
Of course, that would be a little more convincing if I were studying as much as I should. I think I need to sign up for my written test so I'll have a deadline. (Two minutes later: called the FBO. They said I don't really need to be scheduled and can come in any time. OK then.... I'll plan for July 31.)
I did row today, but definitely picked the wrong day. Rudder says yesterday wasn't too hot. Today there were clouds overnight, which tend to hold the heat in so it doesn't cool off much, and at 5AM it was 95 degrees. Ick. I managed 8km, so at least it's enough to qualify (in my mind) as a workout, and not half of one. Still, working out in 95-degree weather is not my favorite thing. I don't like extreme heat much.
Rudder will be home this weekend, after all; a trailer is fortuitously heading out there from one of the local clubs because they'll be taking some of the San Diego club'sboats to Indianapolis for a juniors regatta, so Rudder's and She-Hulk's boats can go with it. I've informed him, though, that I already have plans for the weekend: a massage tomorrow night because I've been having some stress-induced problems with my neck, and of course reading on Saturday, starting whenever the UPS guy stops by. Rudder knows not to expect me to want to do anything else while I'm reading that book. Considering a new HP book only comes out every couple of years and that there's only one more, I don't think he's suffering too much.
It must be difficult to be J.K. Rowling right now. Of course she says (and believes, I'm sure) that she writes the story the way it needs to be written, whatever people thing, but with so much build-up she must be at least a little worried about the reaction to this book. After all, what if she has the big party for 75 cub reporters in that castle in Edinborough... and then when she reads them the book, they hate it? This is especially true because Order of the Phoenix was no one's favorite, not only because of the death of a character(spoiler removed to protect the unwary!) but because Harry is such an annoying prat for most of it. I can see why, that book did things it had to do and took Harry through some crises he needed to face. I think of it as a hinge for the series. I don't know of anyone who's avoiding this book because of that one, but two upsetting books in a row would be a problem.
There are also people who just think OtP is too long and bloated. I don't agree; there are parts that could be cut, but they'd mostly be unneeded plot elements rather than pointless bloat. Rowling has always needed better editing for logical flaws and inconsistencies, but that's nothing new.
There will be people disappointed in this one, I'm sure; it just can't be a light adventure story like the first couple of books. (Or if it is, I'll be the one disappointed.) There is too much going on, and the characters have all been through too much for this to be a simple story. The story will need not only danger but also some ambiguities and heartbreaks to work. That doesn't mean it all needs to be depressing, though. It could be compared for scope and content to Susan Cooper's Dark is Rising series; in that analogy, we're moving through the last half of The Grey King or the first half of Silver on the Tree and there are wonders as well as terrors there, and new characters to love. Remember, Bran doesn't appear until The Grey King, and yet he's one of the most beloved characters in the book. And Silver on the Tree has Gwydion and the Lost Land.
I'm not saying that the series are entirely alike, other than that they are both lengthy series of fantasy for children/ young adults, that both draw on Celtic mythology (The Dark is Rising more than Harry Potter) and that I love both very much. But I do think the analogy is a useful one. This can't be a simple or easy book, but it could be a great one.
If I were Rowling, I'd be squirming on pins and needles to find out if people think it is.
Posted by dichroic at July 14, 2005 11:41 AMNo matter what way Rowling takes the book there are going to be some unhappy people. I was totally torn up losing Sirius but at the same time, there wasn't any other way Rowling could have written it. I don't think the first books were all that happy go lucky either. They're rather brutal right off the bat in fact, what with Harry's orphanhood and abusive home situation. What is most important about the books is the battle between good and evil and all the lessons that the characters learn along the way. I found myself caring and pitying Snape somewhere along the line too. I suppose you've preordered your book. Me, I'll wind up at Borders or somewhere this weekend, but I will be reading Hp by Sunday.... Big hug to you and no I don't think you look preggers. (grin) Good luck with the flying. Love, -J
Posted by: Jenn at July 14, 2005 11:58 AMActually, if you'd mentioned that spoiler a few weeks ago, I'd have been disappointed. :-) I just... well, I haven't been quite as caught up by the Harry Potter books as most people seem to be. I had been reading them at the pace of just-before-the-movies came out. But once EVERYBODY started talking about them, I figured I'd best start reading the later ones a little quicker, if I wanted there to be ANY surprises. heh. Good thing I got Order of the Phoenix finished just before you dropped that one, huh?
Posted by: Melissa at July 14, 2005 02:15 PMI think part of the problem of the last book -- and it took me forever because I kept stopping when I was upset -- was that Harry is growing up, not quite the way we expected him to. He was acting like such a...brat, I guess... and not following up on the responsibilities we expected him to take. And putting himself and others in danger when he shouldn't have. And I kept thinking, Harry, you should know better. (Do I sound like someone's mother?)
Posted by: l-empress at July 14, 2005 03:05 PMI think that's it exactly, Harry doesn't HAVE a mother. There's only Mrs Weasley and she's got lots of her own kids. Whereas Harry's had lots of father types. Rather rough ones at that. Stands to reason the kid is angry and full of bratty bravado, nobody encourages him to be a whole person. No softness. No compassion is ever asked from him. Very few hugs come his way either. I know I get cranky and mean when I don't get hugged enough. It's about time Harry got a mom. ~LA
Posted by: LA at July 14, 2005 06:51 PMI don't see Rowling as the type to suffer much in the way of jitters - she comes across as very grounded and very aware that her authorial responsibilities stop at x -- that what readers do and feel beyond y is not really her problem. Plus, the numbers are on her side -- even if half of her current readers were to hate it, 50% of her fan base still outnumbers that of other top-tier authors by a factor of 10-100+. That, and presumably her editors would have spoken up (they don't sound shy) if the manuscript had sucked hippogriff eggs...
Posted by: Peg at July 15, 2005 07:29 PM